Why should Hyderabad not follow Mumbai, Chennai and Kolkata,

[Meeya Bhai]

I agree with Kiran. We are well known as Hyderabadees all over, so lets just keep it that way. What are you going to achieve by calling it Bhagyanagar. As it is we have tons of communal problems in the city. Sheer nonsense !!

[MeeyaBhai]

Saheen bolay meeyan. En logon koo bilkull kaam dhanda nahin hai deekhe...Jankay ek kaan-bhairee rakhay to maloom hota deekho

[MeeyaBhai]

Uuuf Kya boolay meeyaan. Dil poay lag gayee deekho. Tum sabku insulate (insult) kar deeya deekho

[Kennedy]

Well, while we cannot take the \'whats-in-the-name\' attitude at its face, I would like to remind all that the naming of cities like Bombay, Madras, Calcutta was all done by the British, and renaming the same got more or less an approval even from the public. In these lines, one will not see any reason for HYDERABAD to change its name. But again, someone was talking about \'cannot-change-history\'. How about the twisted facts of the history, my dear? BHAGYA NAGAR could have been a befitting name. Nevertheless, it\'s too late to do this. One should not be in a frenzy about this (then this forum ceases to exist).

[Learner]

Well said Conscious, may your tribe increase. I would like to add that Hyderabadis and Andhrites are more thoughtful and practical people, politicians cannot just satisfy them by cosmetic changes to city names. We needed real grass root changes, employment and infrastructure, and our able Government has provided it. Hyderabad shall remain Hyderabad, and it is a happening place these days. Thanks CM.