Moderator: The Moderator Team

DQ wrote: Its like the "so called Rashtravadis" who call them selves rashtravadis, but go around carrying out anti national activities.
Its the same, "So called Al Qaida". There are many meaning to this term.

paris_dakar wrote:...when did I say I don't?
paris_dakar wrote:(not your specific ass, DQ. I am referring to the collective western, asian, arab, hindu, muslim, christian asses)
paris_dakar wrote:By the way you don't know enough about Hinduism to simply call it a polytheist religion...and religion and faith are two intertwined but different concepts. you can believe in one identity of God or you can divvi up the Divine to make it easier for you(again, 'you' is not you,DQ) to apply to specific situations or whatever...
paris wrote:Ok people, does everyone think I said I don't care or is just DQ?
cad wrote:paris_dakar, say hello to DQ...
Paris wrote:I can't think of one religion that doesn't proclaim a single identity of HIM.

lonewolf wrote:After all this you've explained about Al Qaeda, its obvious that you know Al Qaeda is a well established outfit whose presence and operations are acknowledged globally. Then why do you have to use the term "so called"?

DQ wrote:Who acknowledges and gives them credence?
The same force that created them. Would it not be their problem to sort out the nuiscance they created.

lonewolf wrote:DQ wrote:Who acknowledges and gives them credence?
The same force that created them. Would it not be their problem to sort out the nuiscance they created.
So going by your own statements, would you justify the carnage of 2000 Muslims in Godra following the murder of those in the train?


DQ wrote:Who acknowledges and gives them credence?
The same force that created them. Would it not be their problem to sort out the nuiscance they created.

Every time they mention 'root causes' in the same breath as they condemn an act of terrorism they effectively end up providing a tacit justification for terrorism. What is more, this state of denial prevents a deeper soul searching within the community on the direction the religion is taking and prevents any course correction.
But the implicit justification offered by the so-called moderate Muslims to acts of Islamic terrorism by pointing out at the 'root causes' begs the question: does the 'root cause' of Islamic terrorism lie in social, political and economic conditions in Muslim societies or do they lie in the religion itself? Do the root causes lie in 'grievances' of Muslims or do they lie in the way Islam is perceived, taught and imbibed by its followers?

thats exactly what i was referring to when i was talking about "Integration".Mayavi Morpheus wrote:......muslims societies in west and elsewhere are not really alienating themselves and integration is restricted only to economic integration and not social and cultural integration..........
.
.
.
.
..........if any act of voiclence against a muslim is percieved as an attack on Islam itself and muslims worldwide find it as an obligation to fight this 'injustice'......


Mayavi Morpheus wrote:It really baffles when people condem terrorrist acts saying its not Islamic and then go on to add " you see, if the US didnt attack Iraq and Afghanistan in the first place, there wouldnt have been london bombings". People tend to forget that if Osama bin laden didnt attack US and kill 3000 people (250 of them Indians), US wouldnt have attacked Iraq and Afghanistan!
Didnt US use the 911 bombing as a pretext for attacking afghnistan and later iraq?Xeno wrote:Mayavi Morpheus wrote:It really baffles when people condem terrorrist acts saying its not Islamic and then go on to add " you see, if the US didnt attack Iraq and Afghanistan in the first place, there wouldnt have been london bombings". People tend to forget that if Osama bin laden didnt attack US and kill 3000 people (250 of them Indians), US wouldnt have attacked Iraq and Afghanistan!
That is your problem, I am sorry to say that you are being nothing more than a jerk by saying or imlying the Hindutvadi (RSS) line of thinking that Osama bin laden and Iraq are connected ,whereas there is no clear proof or anything that supports that line of thinking, the question is not who did what ,but who is using what as a pretext to do things at a scale which would otherwise not have been possible.If we go by your logic then since LTTE killed Rajiv Gandhi and others in the blast it would give India the right to bomb Srilanka,thats it!
Going by your posts in this thread,I think you are one of those people who derives pleasure by propagating lies and watching people defend it.

Xeno wrote:That is your problem, I am sorry to say that you are being nothing more than a jerk by saying or imlying the Hindutvadi (RSS) line of thinking that Osama bin laden and Iraq are connected ,whereas there is no clear proof or anything that supports that line of thinking, the question is not who did what ,but who is using what as a pretext to do things at a scale which would otherwise not have been possible.If we go by your logic then since LTTE killed Rajiv Gandhi and others in the blast it would give India the right to bomb Srilanka,thats it!
Going by your posts in this thread,I think you are one of those people who derives pleasure by propagating lies and watching people defend it.

Mayavi Morpheus wrote:Xeno wrote:That is your problem, I am sorry to say that you are being nothing more than a jerk by saying or imlying the Hindutvadi (RSS) line of thinking that Osama bin laden and Iraq are connected ,whereas there is no clear proof or anything that supports that line of thinking, the question is not who did what ,but who is using what as a pretext to do things at a scale which would otherwise not have been possible.If we go by your logic then since LTTE killed Rajiv Gandhi and others in the blast it would give India the right to bomb Srilanka,thats it!
Going by your posts in this thread,I think you are one of those people who derives pleasure by propagating lies and watching people defend it.
Thank you for your wonderful insights. Next time you wish to educate me, please catch up on earlier discussions.
And please leave Hindutva out of this, because Hindutva is a peaceful movement just like Islam - its just some misguided followers![]()
ps: I didnt know that it was RSS idea to attack Iraq.
are u DQ's brother or something?Xeno wrote:You are being modest here ,I cant educated a learned person like you especially after seeing your picture,pretty impressive huh!No I am not saying that it was RSS idea ,all I am saying is that you sound like people who stick to that kinda ideology propogated by RSS and a whole bunch of other organizations related to it, if you are not I wonder if there is any other "movement" that motivates you to post loads and loads of B.S without any references or anything to derive a point,which by the way I am not sure what it is ,is it "integration" which you seem to imply to be confined to drinking(even if a person doesnt want to ) ,going to clubs,pubbing,changing way of life interms of small things like clothing etc.. or "alienation" which according to you is leading a dignified professional life as law abiding citizens paying taxes etc...

Xeno wrote: if you are not I wonder if there is any other "movement" that motivates you to post loads and loads of B.S without any references or anything to derive a point,
which you seem to imply to be confined to drinking(even if a person doesnt want to ) ,going to clubs,pubbing,changing way of life interms of small things like clothing etc.. or "alienation" which according to you is leading a dignified professional life as law abiding citizens paying taxes etc...
... a lawyer [of Pakistani descent] at the Justice Department ...informed us that ... more and more mosques are telling people present for prayers that ‘we need to have separate schools so that we could protect our children from American culture’...
“...I am a 47-year old, working class, white Englishman, who frequently works in London and was in the area of two of the incidents last week, where there were four failed suicide bomber attempts. I’ve always considered myself to be a moderate man and this series of events ... is extremely worrying. Recently I have heard Afro-Caribbean immigrants demanding that all Muslims be sent back (even those born here!). I don’t feel that’s fair but have grave concerns that our cultures are mutually incompatible. We feel like we have taken in a nest of vipers. We feel betrayed by immigrants who have come here to our homeland who consider us as corrupt and immoral. Our women are branded as whores. Some immigrants say we are not fit to govern our own country and that they seek to make Britain a Muslim state...
... a lawyer [of Pakistani descent] at the Justice Department ...informed us that ... more and more mosques are telling people present for prayers that ‘we need to have separate schools so that we could protect our children from American culture’...

when did that happen?Xeno wrote:if you hate Pak hate it to the extent that they know it but dont take it as an excuse to hate or preach hatread towards the Muslim community in general

Xeno wrote:Funny isnt it the way you are stressing "The Paki" paper,now I am not a psychiatrist but I can sure feel that your hatred for Pak is driving you nuts, I dont care if you hate or love anybody,but if you hate Pak hate it to the extent that they know it but dont take it as an excuse to hate or preach hatread towards the Muslim community in general,and thats where the RSS and their likes fit in. I suggest that you use your "purohit" sanctioned "Rational Thinking" at some other anti pak or "rationally" anti pak sites so that you find some easy believers there .I am sure there are whole bunch of them out there.

why did u tell him that??? he'll now accuse u of being part of an RSS plot to lead muslim girls astrayMayavi Morpheus wrote:...I have a paki gf...

CtrlAltDel wrote:why did u tell him that??? he'll now accuse u of being part of an RSS plot to lead muslim girls astray

Return to The Hyderabadi Planet!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
{{todos[0].text}}